✦ Allahabad High Court · 10 Dec 2024

Rekha Devi & Anr. v. State of U.P & Anr.

No. 24074 of 2024RAJ BEER SINGH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Anand

Judgment

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

3.

By means of the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have sought for a suitable direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-II, Bareilly to expedite the proceedings and to decide the case no. 203 of 2022, under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Bhutta, District Bareilly within time stipulated by this Court, which is pending before the aforesaid court.

4.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants were granted maintenance by order dated 11.01.2022 and thereafter applicants have initiated the aforesaid proceedings under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. on 24.02.2022 but the same have not been decided so far and due to which applicants are facing financial hardship. Learned counsel further submitted that a direction may be issued to the concerned Family court to decide the aforesaid case within specific time frame.

5.

In view of aforesaid, the Family court concerned is directed to expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case and to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of copy of this order before the court concerned, provided there is no legal impediment.

6.

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Anand

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 125(3), 482.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 10 Dec 2024. The bench was RAJ BEER SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 24074 of 2024). ← Search more judgments