Mohd Imtiyaz Alias Imtiyaz Ahmad v. State of U.P & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 427, 504, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of with aforesaid observations. Order Date :- 12.11.2024 SP/-
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated
14.02.2023, of Complaint Case No. 1036 of 2022 (Raes Ahmad Khan Vs. Mohd Imtiyaz and others), under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC, P.S.- Shahganj, District- Allahabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 7th, Allahabad.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he is not pressing the prayer for quashing of proceedings and that applicant may be permitted to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial Court concerned and till then protection may be granted to the applicant.
In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicant moves an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court concerned within a period of three weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law by the court concerned. It is further directed that for a period of three weeks from today and in case such an application for discharge is filed within the aforesaid period, till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, provided the applicant cooperates in early disposal of discharge application.
The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of with aforesaid observations. Order Date :- 12.11.2024 SP/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 427, 504, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 12 Nov 2024. The bench was RAJ BEER SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.