Aashu v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 376, 506
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ss. 3, 4
Judgment
Operative part
Sri Vivek Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vijay Kumar Mishra, State Law Officer are present. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 73 of 2024, (State Vs. Aashu), arising out of Case Crime No. 98 of 2024, under Sections 506, 376 of I.P.C., and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, Police Station- Baghpat, District- Baghpat, as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 15.05.2024 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Exclusive Judge (POCSO Act), Baghpat. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Ishan
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 376, 506; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — ss. 3, 4.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 18 Jul 2024. The bench was SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.