Rohidasrao Yadav v. PETITIONERVERSUSSmt. Varsha Meena & Ors.
Judgment
Judgment
C.P.No.878/2024:: 1 ::IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADCONTEMPT PETITION NO.878 OF 2024 INWRIT PETITION NO.5207 OF 2021Ramkisan s/o- Rohidasrao Yadav… PETITIONERVERSUSSmt. Varsha Meena & ors.… RESPONDENTS.......Mr. V.P. Golewar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.D. Ghayal, A.G.P. for State ....… CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT ANDNEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2025O R D E R : Leave granted to replace respondent No.2 with thepresent incumbent in the office. Amendment to be carried outwithin a period of one week. After amendment, issue simplenotice to the respondent No.2 returnable 25th March 2025. 2.Learned Advocate for respondent No.1 submitsthat, there were some lacunae in the proposal and, therefore, the case of the petitioner in respect of pension could not be C.P.No.878/2024:: 2 ::processed further. He seeks time to do the needful incompliance of the order of this Court. We expect fullcompliance of the order of this Court before the next date. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) (R.G. AVACHAT, J.) fmp/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.