Smt Babita And 2 Others v. Shri Ram Autar And 2 Others
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 19 Jul 2024
- Bench
- VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173
Judgment
Appellant :- Smt Babita And 2 Others Respondent :- Shri Ram Autar And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Aditya Vardhan Singh, Nikil Pathak, Sunil Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Sri Aditya Vardhan Singh, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record. This first appeal from order has been filed by the appellants under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and order dated 9.5.2024 passed by Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hapur in M.A.C.P. No.87 of 2020 (Smt. Sandhya and others Vs. Himanchal Singh and others), by which the claim petition filed by claimants-appellants was dismissed. Admit. Issue notice to respondents. Steps be taken within a week by registered post. Summon the record of Claims Tribunal on the expenses of appellants. List after two months. Order Date :- 19.7.2024 Kpy
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 19 Jul 2024. The bench was VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.