Umiya Vijay Saw Mill v. Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Sajid Shamim a/w Mr. Sharif Lakdawala i/b S. Shamim & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Tekale for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 26th March 2025. P.C. : 1) After hearing learned Advocate for Petitioner at length, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief on the principal ground that, the Petitioner has no legal right to challenge Notice dated 4th October 2024 and Order dated 18th October 2024, passed under Section 260 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, learned counsel for Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw Petition unconditionally.
1.1) 2) Leave granted. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )
( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 — s. 260.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 26 Mar 2025. The bench was A S GADKARI, KAMAL KHATA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.