✦ Court unavailable · 15 Feb 2024

Vidyadhar Gajanan Mote & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Anil Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w Paresh Mote i/b Ranjit Shinde Advocates for the Petitioners. Mr.A.I.Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w M.S.Bane, AGP for State- Respondent. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2024 P. C.

#1. In order to enable Ms.Bane, learned AGP to take instructions, especially on three issues namely, the multiplier factor; the classification whether it is irrigated land; and whether belting can be applied within the same land; we stand this matter over to 26 th February, 2024. Utkarsh FEBRUARY 15, 2024

#2. Since, this appears to be an acquisition by private negotiation under Section 19B(2) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, until the instructions are received, the concerned officer shall not initiate acquisition proceedings under Section 19B(3) of the said Act (compulsory acquisition).

#3. Stand over to 26th February, 2024 before the Regular Bench under the caption for ad-interim relief.

#4. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order. [SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN,J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] Utkarsh FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 389 of 2024). ← Search more judgments