✦ Bombay High Court

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd v. Sudhir V R

Arbp No. 384 of 2024ARIF S DOCTOR

Case at a glance

Bench
ARIF S DOCTOR

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. This Petition is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Petitioner has also filed an Application for appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. There is no reply affidavit to the Petition filed…

Judgment

Mr. Tikshta Modi a/w Simran Raj for Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rao for Respondent. _______ _______ CORAM DATE : : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. 20th JANUARY, 2026 P.C.

1.

This Petition is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Petitioner has also filed an Application for appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. There is no reply affidavit to the Petition filed under Section 11. Learned counsel for the Respondent seeks and is granted one week’s time to file a counter affidavit.

2.

In the interregnum Ms. Modi learned counsel for the Petitioner has pressed for limited interim relief of disclosure, submitting that the Respondents had availed a loan facility from the Petitioner and in fact Arbitration has also commenced between the Parties during which an objection was taken as to the uniliteral appointment of the Arbitrator, which was upheld and thus the Arbitration proceedings came to an end. Areeb 17-ARBP-384-2024 (OS).DOC

3.

Having heard learned counsel and having perused the record, I find that there is, and can be no dispute as to the fact that the Respondents had availed the self finance facilities. Thus, in my view, further request for a disclosure to be made by the Respondent is entirely justified. Hence, the Respondent shall make a disclosure in terms of prayer clause ‘b’, which reads thus;

b. That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition and arbitration proceedings, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to order and direct the Respondent, to file his respective comprehensive affidavit disclosing on oath the assets both movable and immovable held by him jointly and or severally including details of all bank accounts (with account numbers, Bank, Branch etc) and all the amounts lying in the Bank accounts, all debts and receivables payable by third parties to the borrower/s/Respondent with the precise and exact addresses of such debtors who owe money to the Respondent, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of the order or within such time as this Hon'ble court may deemed fit;

4.

Stand over both the matters 3rd February, 2026. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Areeb

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Arbp No. 384 of 2024). ← Search more judgments