✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Jun 2024

Rashid Babasaheb Jamadar v. Dilip Tavanappa Kamble & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 4852 of 2024AMIT BORKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The writ petition stands disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4852 OF 2024 SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN Digitally signed by SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN 17:37:54 +0530 Rashid Babasaheb Jamadar V/s. … Petitioner Dilip Tavanappa Kamble & Ors. … Respondents Mr. P. D. Dalvi, for Petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 18, 2024 P.C.:

1.

The order impugned in the writ petition is interlocutory order capable of being challenged under Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Therefore, keeping all questions raised in the writ petition, open to be agitated in the substantive appeal.

Operative part

2.

The writ petition stands disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 105.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 Jun 2024. The bench was AMIT BORKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4852 of 2024). ← Search more judgments