✦ Orissa High Court

Shushena Meher v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10820 of 2021D DASH

Case at a glance

Bench
D DASH

Outcome

Bail granted

it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned Counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by…

Judgment

Petitioner Mr.J. Sahu, Advocate …. Opposite Party Mr.S.K. Nayak, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH Order No. ORDER 2401.2022

1.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

2.

The Petitioner being in custody in connection with Jagdalpur P.S. Case No.170 of 2021 corresponding to Special G.R. Case No.96 of 2021 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Padampur running for commission of offence under section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, has filed this application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Operative part

4.

Taking into account the submissions made; further keeping in view the materials on records and the quantity of contraband ganja said to have been seized as those stand // 2 // against the Petitioner with other surrounding circumstances including the period of detention of the Petitioner in custody and on going through the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge; in the absence of any such impediment; it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the court in seisin of the case with further condition that he will not indulge himself in commission of similar activity. Violation of any of the above condition(s) shall entail cancellation of bail.

5.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned Counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned Advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s Office order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022. (D.Dash) Judge Basu

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 20(b)(ii)(B); Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10820 of 2021). ← Search more judgments