Ashok Kumar Behera & Ors. v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M S RAMAN
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MRS (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 11-Oct-2023 16:27:19
Judgment
Petitioners Mr. U.K. Samal, Advocate Opposite Parties Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA CORAM: ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER 11.10.2023 Order No. 01. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Narottam Rath v. State of Odisha, 2023 SCC OnLine Ori. 153, the impugned orders are set-aside and the following directions are issued: (i) A direction is issued to the ASO to now proceed to record the name of the petitioners concerning the land in question in their name in the RoR, in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks. (ii) Where the land in question stands recorded in the final published RoR in the name of the Government that entry will stand cancelled by virtue of this order and the ASO will proceed to record it in favour of the petitioners.
The above directions will be carried out within a period of four months from today. It is made clear that this order will not prevent the Government from exercising powers under Section 3-B of the OGLS Act, in accordance with law.
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MRS (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 11-Oct-2023 16:27:19
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.