Pramod Kumar Bal v. R.T.O., Dhenkanal
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K R MOHAPATRA
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed of directing the Petitioner to pay the tax
Provisions considered
- Orissa Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1975 s. 13(2)
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 200
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Petitioner to pay the tax levied on him before the R.T.O.-cum-Taxing Officer, Dhenkanal- Opposite Party within three weeks from today and so far as the penalty is concerned, the Petitioner…
Judgment
Mr. Braja Mohan Sarangi, Advocate -versus- R.T.O., Dhenkanal …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER 30.11.2022
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
The Petitioner’s vehicle bearing Registration No. OR- 19-J-0366 (Truck) is the subject matter of the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner shall pay the amount of tax and he shall file show cause under Section 13(2) of the Orissa Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1975 so far as penalty is concerned and so far as the offence is concerned, he shall file an application under Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compounding.
Operative part
Taking into consideration the submissions advanced, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Petitioner to pay the tax levied on him before the R.T.O.-cum-Taxing Officer, Dhenkanal- Opposite Party within three weeks from today and so far as the penalty is concerned, the Petitioner shall file show cause under Section 13(2) of the Orissa Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1975 within the aforesaid period and so far as the offence is concerned, // 2 // he shall file an application for compounding under Section 200 of the Motor Vehicles Act within the aforesaid period. On payment of tax and on compounding of the offence, if accepted, the vehicle bearing Registration No.OR-19-J-0366 (Truck) be released in favour of the Petitioner.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is disposed of directing the Petitioner to pay the tax
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Orissa Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1975 — s. 13(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 200.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.