✦ Orissa High Court

Abinash Naik @ Bapun v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10836 of 2022V NARASINGH

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 99. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) Ayesha Judge

Judgment

Mr. R.R. Das, Advocate Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 20.12.2022

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The petitioner is an accused in connection with G.R. Case No.322 of 2022, pending before the learned S.D.J.M., Champua, arising out of Jhumpura P.S. Case No.105 of 2022, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 292/506/507/509/498-A/34 of IPC and Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act and Section 67 of I.T. Act.

3.

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Champua, by order dated 28.09.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2022 and on instruction, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and that the petitioner is the first offender, hence his further continuance in custody is unwarranted.

5.

Taking into account the nature of allegations and considering that charge-sheet has already been filed, as stated, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin.

6.

Before releasing the petitioner, learned Court in seisin is called upon to verify the criminal antecedent. If it comes to the fore that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of similar nature, this order shall stand recalled.

7.

If it comes to the fore that charge-sheet has not been filed as on 20.12.2022, this order shall stand recalled.

9.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) Ayesha Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10836 of 2022). ← Search more judgments