✦ Orissa High Court

Madhusudan Patra v. State of Odisha & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27707 of 2022BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Case at a glance

Bench
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the Petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent Petitioner involving the vigilance case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel for the…
  • Para 44. With the aforesaid direction, the writ Petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Subrat (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge

Judgment

ORDER 20.10.2022

1.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the Petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent Petitioner involving the vigilance case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner has also the support of decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1999 SC 1416, decided by taking support of the old decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1965 SC 155. This Court accordingly disposes of the writ Petition directing stay of the Disciplinary proceeding dtd.05.05.2022 under Annexure-3 involving the Petitioner till finalization of the Sambalpur Vigilance P.S. Case No.07 of 2019 pending in the Court of learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Sundargarh. This Court also directs involving Sambalpur Vigilance P.S. Case No.07 of 2019 be expedited and efforts be made to dispose the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months hence. // 2 //

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ Petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Subrat (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27707 of 2022). ← Search more judgments