✦ Orissa High Court

Prasanna Kumar Patnaik v. State Counsel

CPC) No. 56 of 2018B R SARANGI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the above, CONTC(CPC) is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file separate petition. Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

Judgment

Mr. P.R. Jiban Dash, Advocate Vs. ….. Opposite parties State Counsel CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER 04.03.2022 Order No. 01 This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the order passed by the Tribunal has been complied with partially. So far as grant of interest is concerned, there is delay on the part of the authority, which is tell tale.

3.

In view of the above, CONTC(CPC) is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file separate petition. Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CPC) No. 56 of 2018). ← Search more judgments