State of Odisha v. Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 379
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) PKS Judge
Judgment
Mr. Debashis Mitra, Advocate State of Odisha -versus- …. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 28.09.2022 Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The Petitioner is an accused in G.R. Case No.918 of 2022 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C (C), Cuttack, arising out of Mangalabag P.S. Case No.170 of 2022, offence under Section 379 IPC and is in custody since 01.08.2022.
Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack by order dated 9.9.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.
Perused the order of rejection. Taking note of the nature of allegation and the punishment prescribed, this Court directs the Petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned court in seisin over the matter. Considering the criminal proclivity of the Petitioner, it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the I.I.C., Patkura Police Station once every week till end of January, 2023 and the certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the court in seisin over the matter.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) PKS Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.