✦ Orissa High Court

Gobinda @ Kabal Munda v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 8705 of 2023V NARASINGH

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, BLAPL stands disposed of. Learned Court in seisin is requested to expedite the trial since it is stated that 11 out of 21 charge sheeted witnesses have already been examined.

Judgment

Mr. S.R. Rout, Advocate Opposite Party Mr. K.K. Gaya, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 02.11.2023 Order No.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The Petitioner is an accused in S.T. Case No.292 of 2021 pending on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Cuttack, arising out of Markatnagar P.S. Case No.96 of 2021 for commission of the offence under Section 302/498-A IPC.

3.

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s. 439 Cr.P.C by the learned Sessions Judge, Cuttack, by order dated 27.07.2023 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel that in view of order dated 16.01.2023 passed in BLAPL No.232 of 2023, since the trial was not concluded within the time fixed by this Court, on the prayer of the learned Court in seisin time was extended and the same is likely to expire on 11.11.2023.

5.

In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail application. Liberty is given to the Petitioner to renew his prayer at a later stage.

7.

Accordingly, BLAPL stands disposed of. Learned Court in seisin is requested to expedite the trial since it is stated that 11 out of 21 charge sheeted witnesses have already been examined.

8.

Registry is called upon to communicate this order. (V. NARASINGH) PKS Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRADEEP KUMAR SWAIN Designation: A.R.-cum-Sr. Secy. Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Nov-2023 12:11:12

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 8705 of 2023). ← Search more judgments