Sarat Chandra Sahoo & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Pressing the Memo at Flag-‘X’, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of this writ application. The prayer being allowed; the writ application stands dismissed of as withdrawn. (D. Dash), Judge (G.Satapathy) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Reason…
Judgment
ORDER 07.11.2023 Petitioners Mr.S.B.Mohanty, Advocate Opp. Parties Mr.P.K.Parhi, Dy.S.G of India With Ms.B.Sahu, CGC for O.P.1. Order No.
1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical) mode.
2.
Pressing the Memo at Flag-‘X’, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of this writ application. The prayer being allowed; the writ application stands dismissed of as withdrawn. (D. Dash), Judge (G.Satapathy) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 08-Nov-2023 14:39:02
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 22207 of 2022).
← Search more judgments