Snigdha Mohanty v. Mr. P.K.Parhi, DSGI
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 483
- Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ss. 132, 132(1)(1), 132(1)(b)(c)(f), 132(5)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Manoj Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANOJ ROUT K Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 27-Oct-2025 14:07:47
Judgment
Mr. Y.Das, Sr. Advocate Mr.N.K.Sethi, Advocate Union of India … Opposite Party -versus- Mr. P.K.Parhi, DSGI Mr.K.Panda, CGC CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER(ORAL) 24.10.2025
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with 2(a)CC No.36 of 2025 pending in the file of learned S.D.J.M., Panposh, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.132(1)(b)(c)(f)/132(1)(1)/132(5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 on the main allegation of fraudulently availing Input Tax Credit for an amount of Rs.85.00 crores.
Heard Mr. Yasobant Das, learned Senior Advocate being assisted by Mr.N.K.Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K.Parhi, learned DSGI along with Mr. K.Panda, learned CGC and perused the records.
After going through the materials placed, it appears that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for Clause (a) to Clause (d) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 132 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the maximum punishment provided therein is for five years imprisonment. All the offences are triable by the Magistrate and do not prescribe any punishment beyond five years. Further, no material has been brought to the notice of the Court about the involvement of the present petitioner in any other case of similar nature. Besides, the petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2025 and in the meantime, complaint has already been filed against the petitioner in Court. It is also not disputed that the petitioner is a lady and the proviso appended to Section 480 of BNS applies to her in the matter of bail.
In view of the discussions made herein above and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged vis-(cid:224)-vis the accusation sought to be brought against the petitioner and keeping in view the period of detention of the petitioner in custody and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits admits the petitioner to bail.
Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the GST Authorities, if required.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Manoj Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANOJ ROUT K Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 27-Oct-2025 14:07:47
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.