✦ Orissa High Court

State of Odisha & Ors. v. State Counsel

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 20975 of 2022B R SARANGI

Case at a glance

Bench
B R SARANGI

Outcome

Disposed of

petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-9 taking into consideration Section 255 (1)…

Judgment

Petitioner Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate State of Odisha and others Vs. ….. Opposite parties State Counsel CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER 25.08.2022 Order No. 01 This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to demarcate the public road and decide the quantum of encroachment by the petitioner within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation before opposite party no.4 vide Annexure-9, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration Section 255 (1) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

Operative part

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-9 taking into consideration Section 255 (1) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950, and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 — s. 255(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 20975 of 2022). ← Search more judgments