Lipu @ Tapan Nayak v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V NARASINGH
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi
Judgment
Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No.
ORDER 22.09.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Mr. C.R. Satpathy has entered appearance on behalf of the informant. Vakalatnama filed by him is taken on record. Name of Mr. Satpathy be reflected in the file as well as in the cause list and CMS of the Court.
The petitioner is an accused in Spl. G.R. Case No.61 of 2022 pending in the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Court under POCSO Act, Cuttack, arising out of Baramba P.S. Case No.128 2022, offence under Sections 363/376(2)n/294/34 of IPC and U/s. 6 of POCSO Act.
Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Special Court under POCSO Act, Cuttack by order dated
27.07.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.
Perused the 164 Statement and medical examination report. Considering the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail application at this stage.
6. It shall be open for the petitioner to renew his prayer after examination of the victim.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.