✦ Orissa High Court · 19 Mar 2025

Orissa High Court · 2025

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 22176 of 2026WRIT PETITION

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of contentions of the petitioners, with a direction to the Director of Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.2) to consider the grievance of the…

Judgment

Ms. J. Biswal, Advocate State of Odisha & others …. Opp. Parties -versus- Mr. S. Rath, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 30.07.2026

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

2.

It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that their claim to get the benefits under Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994, is similar to the case of the Appellant in FAO No.509 of 2014, which has been disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench on 19th March 2025 and upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

3.

It is further prayed on behalf of the Petitioners that the representation under Annexure-3 may be considered by appropriate authority.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of contentions of the petitioners, with a direction to the Director of Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.2) to consider the grievance of the Petitioner as per the representation at Annexure-2, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the Writ Petition. Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) Bijay

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Orissa High Court, on 19 Mar 2025. The bench was WRIT PETITION.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 22176 of 2026). ← Search more judgments