✦ Orissa High Court

Anil Kumar Das v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8415 of 2026

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Mili Judge
Read the judgmentFind similar cases

Judgment

Mr. L. Mahapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. 01.

1.

ORDER 28.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.372 of 2026 pending on the file of learned JMFC-l(Cog. Taking), Bhubaneswar, arising out of Tamando P.S. Case No.125 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 316(2) of BNS.

3.

Taking into account the nature of allegations and punishment prescribed, this Court has no iota of doubt that the investigating agency shall scrupulously follow the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar vrs. State of Bihar & another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and reiterated in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation & another, (2022) 10 SCC 51.

4.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Mili Judge

Find similar cases Start drafting free

More cases under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Browse the section directory for this act →

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8415 of 2026). ← Search more judgments