Boddu Gandhi v. None
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ARINDAM SINHA, SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. On cursory perusal we find impugned is judgment dated 16th March, 2023 made by the family Court under section 125 in Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. As such, the report appears to have been made following provision in sub-section (4) of section 19, Family…
- Para 44. Registry is directed to accordingly change nomenclature and place the matter before the assigned Bench. In doing so the registry will also communicate this order to the recorded learned advocate. (Arindam Sinha) Judge (S.S. Mishra) Judge Sks Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by…
Judgment
ORDER 01.11.2023 None appears. The matter has been marked as a matrimonial appeal. However, Order No.
report is that it may be registered as RPFAM.
On cursory perusal we find impugned is judgment dated 16th March, 2023 made by the family Court under section 125 in Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. As such, the report appears to have been made following provision in sub-section (4) of section 19, Family Courts Act, 1984. // 2 //
Registry is directed to accordingly change nomenclature and place the matter before the assigned Bench. In doing so the registry will also communicate this order to the recorded learned advocate. (Arindam Sinha) Judge (S.S. Mishra) Judge Sks Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 01-Nov-2023 17:34:46
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.