✦ Orissa High Court

Sanjaya Swain @ Sanjay v. State of Odisha

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the present CRLMC. Accordingly, the order of N.B.W(A) issued to the Petitioner on 27.01.2026 by the learned Court below in the aforesaid case…

Judgment

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pradhan, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. 01.

#1. ORDER 03.07.2026 This matter taken up through hybrid arrangement.

#2. The Petitioner has filed this CRLMC assailing the order of issuance of NBW(A) dated 27.01.2026 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kodala in Sessions Trial No.90 of 2025 against him.

#3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

#4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was earlier granted bail vide order dated

17.02.2024 and he was regularly attending the Court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 27.01.2026, the Petitioner could not remain present in Court due to non-communication by the conducting Counsel. Hence, the learned Court in seisin over the matter issued the order of N.B.W. against him. He further submits that the Petitioner undertakes to co-operate till the end of the trial and appear before the learned Court below on each date of posting of the case without fail.

#5. In view of such facts and submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the present CRLMC. Accordingly, the order of N.B.W(A) issued to the Petitioner on 27.01.2026 by the learned Court below in the aforesaid case is, hereby, quashed.

#6. The Petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the said Court shall release him on bail with some stringent conditions. In addition, the Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred only) as cost for violating the Court’s order, in favour of the Kodala Bar Association. The said amount shall be utilized for the purpose of purchasing of books in the Bar Library. Receipt showing deposit of the cost shall be presented before the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

#7. Accordingly, this CRLMC is disposed of.

#8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. Judge (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Sipun

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 2023 of 2026). ← Search more judgments