✦ Orissa High Court

Radhashyam Biswal v. State of Odisha & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 15194 of 2022BISWANATH RATH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (Biswanath Rath) Judge Ayaskanta Jena

Judgment

Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Nayak, Advocate Opposite Party(s) Mr. S. Ghose, Addl. Govt. Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH ORDER 05.07.2022 Order No.

1.

This writ petition involves an allegation of non-disposal of the Demarcation Proceeding vide Demarcation Case No.46 of 2018.

2.

Considering the allegation of the Petitioner to be a serious one, this Court directs the Tahasildar, Kendrapara-O.P.3 to conclude the proceeding vide Demarcation Case No.46 of 2018 involving the parties likely to be affected, within a period of two months from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order by the Petitioner, if the same is still pending.

Operative part

3.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. (Biswanath Rath) Judge Ayaskanta Jena

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 15194 of 2022). ← Search more judgments