✦ Orissa High Court

M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation v. Mohini Mahananda & Anr.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No. 34 of 2023

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the Court appoints Dr. Justice Akshaya Kumar Mishra, Former Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the High Court of Orissa, Arbitration Centre. The arbitration petition…

Judgment

Mr. Srinivas Patnaik, Advocate -Versus- Mohini Mahananda and another …. Opposite Parties Order No. CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORDER 11.12.2024

02.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. This application has been filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

3.

Despite valid service of notice, the opposite parties have not entered appearance.

4.

After having gone through the material on record, I find, there is arbitration clause vide Clause-19 of the agreement in question, which provides that any dispute or differneces of any nature whatsoever shall be resolved through the process of arbitration.

Operative part

5.

Accordingly, the Court appoints Dr. Justice Akshaya Kumar Mishra, Former Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the High Court of Orissa, Arbitration Centre. The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of

5. this order be communicated to the learned Arbitrator forthwith. Chief Justice (Chakradhari Sharan Singh) Arun Mishra Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ARUN KUMAR MISHRA Designation: ADR-Cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Dec-2024 12:11:17

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No. 34 of 2023). ← Search more judgments