State of Odisha (In all) & Anr. v. Chudamani Debta & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHITTARANJAN DASH
Key paragraphs
- Para 0303. I.A. Nos.1009, 902, 1005, 1003, 1007, 1008, 1006, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1050, 1049, 1055, 1141, 1145, 1142, 1146, 1143, 1147 of 2026 In all these matters, Interlocutory Applications have been moved supported by individual affidavits seeking recall of the orders whereby the Writ Appeals…
Judgment
Appellant Mr. S. B. Mohanty, AGA -versus- Chudamani Debta and Ors. Kishore Kumar Sahu & Ors. Priyabrata Mishra & Ors. Pareswar Parida & Anr. Paramananda Barik & Ors. (In W.A. No. 2851 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 2788 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 2790 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 2862 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 2865 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 2867 of 2024) Priyadarsini Ota & Ors. (In W.A. No. 2872 of 2024) Bibekananda Adhikary & Ors. (In W.A. No. 2875 of 2024) Soumya Ranjan Nayak & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3025 of 2024) Rajat Kumar Samal & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3027 of 2024) Himansu Bhusan Patra & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3030 of 2024) Mrutyunjay Mohanta & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3118 of 2024) Bikash Chandra Khora & Ors. Sudhir Kumar Panigrahi & Anr. (In W.A. No. 3119 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 3122 of 2024) Manju Naik & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3123 of 2024) Dusmanta Sahu Susanta Kumar Mohanta & Ors. (In W.A. No. 3213 of 2024) (In W.A. No. 158 of 2025) Dibakar Mohapatra (In W.A. No. 278 of 2025) Pratap Kumar Patel & Anr. (In W.A. No. 1104 of 2025) Baidhar Behera & Ors. Respondents Mr. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate Mr. S. Routray, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 05.05.2026
I.A. Nos.1009, 902, 1005, 1003, 1007, 1008, 1006, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1050, 1049, 1055, 1141, 1145, 1142, 1146, 1143, 1147 of 2026 In all these matters, Interlocutory Applications have been moved supported by individual affidavits seeking recall of the orders whereby the Writ Appeals have been disposed off by this Bench. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Respondent- employee submits and we agree that Applications of the kind do not lie except where the grounds of law as discussed by the Apex Court in S.P Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath, (1994) 1 SCC 1, do avail. We notice that such grounds are not taken up in the recall of Applications nor these recall Applications can be construed as review petitions either. In the above circumstances, the Applications are rejected in a wholesale way more particularly when the very orders which are sought to be recalled are being examined by the Apex Court in the SLPs filed by the Applicant-State. Ordered accordingly. AKPradhan/Priyanka Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYANKA BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 07-May-2026 11:06:41 (Krishna S. Dixit) Judge (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.