Arbitration Case No. 268 of 2019 · Orissa High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, this Court, without entering into such controversy, disposes of the writ petition as withdrawn with an observation that Petitioners may avail the remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, if the same available to them at this stage.…
Judgment
Mr. Susanta Kumar Rout, Advocate State of Odisha and others -versus- …. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 20.08.2025
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Petitioners in this writ petition seek to assail the order/award dated 11th September, 2024 (Annexure-4) passed by the Collector, Angul-cum-Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No.268 of 2019.
In course of hearing, learned counsel submits that Petitioners have the remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, ‘the Arbitration Act’) to challenge order/award dated 11th September, 2024 (Annexure-4).
Mr. Mishra, learned ASC does not have any objection with regard to availing the remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, but he submits that in view of the statutory Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA CUTTACK Date: 21-Aug-2025 15:51:26 restrictions, an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act may not be entertained at this stage.
In view of the above, this Court, without entering into such controversy, disposes of the writ petition as withdrawn with an observation that Petitioners may avail the remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, if the same available to them at this stage. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) Judge s.s.satapathy
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.