Vicky Sahoo @ Sanjay Dutta v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the Petitioner be released on bail subject to
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 20(b)(ii)(c), 29
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 25
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground that the case of illegal trafficking of contraband article is increasing rapidly in the State of Odisha. Therefore, no leniency should be shown to the accused person involving…
- Para 88. With the aforesaid observation the BLAPL stands disposed of.
Judgment
Opposite Party Mr. K.K. Nayak, ASC for State CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA ORDER 16.05.2022 Order No. 01.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for bail in connection with Plantsite P.S. Case No.37 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.6 of 2022, pending in the file of learned 1st Additional District Judge, Rourkela, for commission of alleged offences under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of N.D.P.S. Act read with Section 29 of N.D.P.S. Act and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959.
Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Perused the FIR, Case Diary and statement of witnesses.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is in custody since 31.1.2022. It is further submitted that Petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature. The further submission is that since Petitioner is a resident of // 2 // local area, there is no chance of evading the trial of the case. It is also submitted that Petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions as fixed by this Hon’ble Court in the event of release on bail.
Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground that the case of illegal trafficking of contraband article is increasing rapidly in the State of Odisha. Therefore, no leniency should be shown to the accused person involving in such matters. Accordingly, he prays for rejection of the bail application of the Petitioner.
Operative part
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the custodial detention of the Petitioner and the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail subject to stringent conditions. Let the Petitioner be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter subject to the following terms and conditions : i) He shall not indulge in similar nature of offence; ii) He shall appear before the trial court on each and every date and shall cooperate for early conclusion of trial; iii) He shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not make any attempt to influence or threaten the witnesses; // 3 // iv) He shall provide his address as well as his phone number to the concerned Police Station and keep the same updated in the event the same is changed in future; v) He shall appear before the concerned Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on Sunday between 10 to 1 P.M. till conclusion of trial. vi) He shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without prior permission of the trial court; vii) Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to the condition that learned court below shall verify whether the Petitioner has any criminal antecedents of similar nature. In the event it is found that the Petitioner has any criminal antecedent of similar nature, this order shall automatically stand revoked.
With the aforesaid observation the BLAPL stands disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. U.K.Sahoo (A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the Petitioner be released on bail subject to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 20(b)(ii)(c), 29; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 25.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.