✦ Orissa High Court

Mochiala Manga & Ors. v. Dhanamali Bhue & Anr.

BISWANATH RATH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. M.K.Rout (Biswanath Rath) Judge

Judgment

Mr.N.C.Pati, Adv. -versus- Dhanamali Bhue & anr. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr.S.J.Pradhan, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH Order No.

2.

ORDER 26.10.2022 Heard learned counsel for the Parties. The Writ Petition involves rejection of an Application at the instance of the Defendants under Order 14 Rule 2(2) of C.P.C. asking the trial court for deciding the issue on jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. Trial Court entering into argument has come to hold that since the issue on the same line is already there for trail of the suit, issues together can be decided in the ultimate trial of the suit. Such application having been rejected gave rise to filing of the present Writ Petition.

3.

For the opinion of this Court, the suit was filed in 2002 and the Defendants having anxiety for long continuing with the suit asked for deciding such question as a preliminary issue. This Court // 2 // finds, in the meantime, there has been substantial loss of time nearly two decades. In the event the Petitioners would not have challenged this order may be the suit would have been over. However, reading the observation of the trial court in dismissing the Application under Order 14 rule 2(2) of C.P.C., this Court finds, the trial court has kept open such issue to be decided along with such other issues.

4.

Considering the loss of time in the meantime, this Court instead of entering into such subject leaves it open to the Parties to get trial of the suit also involving such issue. Trial of the suit pending since 2002 be concluded within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order.

5.

With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. M.K.Rout (Biswanath Rath) Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments