Sufia Sultan v. Chairman State Transport Authority, Cuttack
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S K PANIGRAHI
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Pravakar Behera, Standing Counsel for Transport Department CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI ORDER 20.03.2025
This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction to send the e-Challan/VCR dated 18.03.2024 (Annexure-1) in respect of the vehicle bearing Registration No.OD-02-A-9367 (Bus) to the jurisdictional Magistrate for appropriate relief. He further prays for a direction to the Opposite Party to consider Order No. 01. his case for issuance of fitness certificate and permit. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 24-Mar-2025 18:44:00
Mr. Pravakar Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Department submits that in view of violation of the provisions 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Petitioner is required to appear before the Authority, who has issued the VCR and pray for transmission of the record to the jurisdictional Magistrate, if she wants to contest the case. The petitioner has not yet appeared before the authority and made such prayer. Since the Challan/VCR amount is Rs.10,000/-, the petitioner may be directed to deposit 50% of the same and contest the case before the jurisdictional Magistrate.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court directs that without prejudice to the case of either party, in the event the Petitioner deposits 50% of the VCR amount, i.e., Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) before the Opposite Party, the e-Challan/VCR shall be transmitted to the jurisdictional Magistrate for adjudication in accordance with law, if not already transmitted. It is made clear that such deposit, if made, as directed above, shall be subject to the result of the adjudication to be made by the jurisdictional Magistrate.
So far as issuance of fitness certificate and permit is concerned, the Petitioner may apply for the same to the Opposite Party by filing necessary application, which shall be considered in accordance with law. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 24-Mar-2025 18:44:00 3
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. Judge Murmu ( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 24-Mar-2025 18:44:00
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.