Shweta Tiwari v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V NARASINGH
Provisions considered
- Odisha Excise Act, 2008 ss. 52, 59(d), 62
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya
Judgment
Mr. A.K. Patra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. 01.
ORDER 27.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with 2(a) C.C. Case No.85/2026 pending on the file of learned SDJM(P), Rourkela, arising out of P.R. Case No. 232 of 2025-26 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 52/ 59(d) and 62 of the Odisha Excise Act, 2008.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.
Taking into account the Petitioner is a ladies, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the Petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, she shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions deemed just and proper with further conditions that she will cooperate with the investigation.
Violation of any of the above condition(s) shall entail cancellation of bail.
Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.