✦ Orissa High Court

Kamal Lochan Jena & Anr. v. State of Odisha

ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2784 of 2026ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA2 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge Debasis Page 2 of 2.

Judgment

Represented By Adv. – Mr. P.C. Jena Opposite Party Represented By Adv. – Mr. D.K. Sahoo, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 23.04.2026 Order No.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-Opposite Party.

3.

The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 of B.N.S.S., 2023 by the Petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No.83 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No.336 of 2024, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M.(S), Cuttack, registered for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 498- A/294/323/506/341/34 of the I.P.C. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

4.

It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Page 1 of 1. Petitioners are parents-in-law of the victim. He further contended that there is no allegation of any torture against the present Petitioners. He further submitted that they have falsely implicated in the present case at the instant of the Informant. He further submitted that the Petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent and that they belong to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of their absconding. On such ground, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners be released on pre-arrest bail on any stringent terms and conditions.

5.

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, objected to the release of the Petitioners on pre-arrest bail on the ground that investigation is still on and that in the event the Petitioners are released on bail, there is every likelihood that they might abscond from justice which would cause delay in conclusion of the investigation.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties and the materials placed before the Court, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners by the Arresting Officer in the aforesaid case, Petitioners shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper by the Arresting Officer.

7.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge Debasis Page 2 of 2.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2784 of 2026). ← Search more judgments