The Villagers of Deuli under v. State of Odisha, represented
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Considering the grievance as stated by the Petitioners in their representation, the writ petition is disposed of calling upon the Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 to consider the representation of the Petitioners at Annexure-4 within a period of six weeks from the date of…
Judgment
ORDER 26.02.2026 Order No. 01.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
The grievance of the Petitioners, who are the villagers of Deuli under Parajapada Gram Panchayat, is non-inclusion of the village in Badamba N.A.C in terms of Section 4 of the Odisha Municipal Act, 1950.
It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Govt. of Odisha, Housing and Urban Development Department, by notification dated 22.12.2025 at Annexure-2 have treated the following nine villages as transitional areas to be converted to N.A.C in terms of the Section 4 of the Odisha Municipal Act,
1950. It is alleged that though the Petitioners’ village is qualified in every respect, the same has been left out. Sl. No. (1)
2. Name of the Village Name of the concerned Grama Panchayat to which the village belongs (2) (3) Badambagarh Badambagarh Jodamba -do-
Biswambarpur Godapokhari Khamarasahi Muliabank Mangalpur Tulasipur Champeidwar -do- Godapokharl -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-
It is further stated that ventilating their grievance, the Petitioners have filed a representation to the Collector, Cuttack and a copy thereof has also been endorsed to Hon’ble Minister of Housing and Urban Development Department, Govt. of Odisha and the concerned MLA.
It is stated that though the representation has been made since 05.02.2026, no action has been taken and alleging inaction in respect thereof, the present writ petition has been filed.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the writ petition is pre-mature and the same ought not to be entertained.
Considering the grievance as stated by the Petitioners in their representation, the writ petition is disposed of calling upon the Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 to consider the representation of the Petitioners at Annexure-4 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition. Till such period, no consequential action in terms of the Annexure-2 shall be taken.
It is needless to state that while considering the representation of the Petitioners, which is at Annexure-4, the affected parties shall be given an opportunity of hearing and the decision so taken shall be intimated to the Petitioners.
9. UCC as per rules. (V. Narasingh) Judge Santoshi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 27-Feb-2026 19:15:09
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.