Rajesh Kumar Das v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S K SAHOO
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. State of Odisha 2. Baisakhi Priyadarshini Panda …. Opp. Parties Mr. D.K. Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 09.02.2022 This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Video Conferencing/Physical Mode). Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that no first…
Judgment
Mr. P.K. Biswal, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha 2. Baisakhi Priyadarshini Panda …. Opp. Parties Mr. D.K. Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 09.02.2022 This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Video Conferencing/Physical Mode). Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that no first information report has yet been registered against the petitioner. Since there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain the application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy after the registration of the F.I.R. Interim order dated 18.02.2021 stands vacated. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. Order No. 03. Judge ( S.K. Sahoo) RKM // 2 //
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.