Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo v. Odisha Gramya Bank, Dhenkanal
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of for
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of for want of instruction. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Alok/Gs (M.S. SAHOO) JUDGE
Judgment
Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO ORDER 22.02.2023 Order No. 02. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the brief has been taken away by his client. Therefore, he has no instruction in the matter.
Operative part
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of for want of instruction. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE Alok/Gs (M.S. SAHOO) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.