Ajaya Kumar Agarwal v. None
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the fact that Misc. case No.82 of 2012 was a proceeding under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C., the proceeding must have been finalized by now, for which the CRLMC is disposed of.
Judgment
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 16.01.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) Order No. 05.
None appears for the petitioner or Opposite Party No.2 when the matter is called.
Order dated 10.07.2012 passed by the learned Executive Magistrate, Rairangpur in connection with Misc. case No.82 of 2012 has been challenged. In the impugned order the learned Magistrate had rejected petition filed for local inspection of the case.
Considering the fact that Misc. case No.82 of 2012 was a proceeding under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C., the proceeding must have been finalized by now, for which the CRLMC is disposed of.
It is open to the counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel the Opposite Party No.2 file an application modification/recall of the order by13.02.2026 if any, cause of action still survives. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 19-Jan-2026 11:25:00
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.