✦ Orissa High Court

Smt. Kkamala Das @ Kamala Rani Das v. Govind Prasad Bhomrajka & Anr.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK R.S.A No. 114 of 2004R K PATTANAIK

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed as being withdrawn. (R.K.Pattanaik) Judge Kabita

Judgment

Mr. G.Mukherji, Sr.Advocate & Associates -Versus- Govind Prasad Bhomrajka & Another …. Respondents CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 24.07.2023 I.A. Nos. 736,737 & 738 of 2022 Order No.

1. Instant I.As have been filed by the appellants substitution of the LRs of appellant No. 6 after setting aside abatement and condoning the delay on the grounds stated therein.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that appellant No. 6 died on 15th March, 2022 leaving behind the LRs, who are required to be substituted in his place in the interest of justice.

3. No objection is received from the other side.

4. Considering the fact that appellant No.6 is dead and there has been delay in applying for substitution of his LRs but having regard to the fact that the parties have resolved to seek permission to Court for withdrawal of the case, the substitution should be allowed after setting aside abatement and condoning the delay which has occasioned while applying for it.

5. Accordingly, it is ordered.

6. In the result, I.As stand allowed. Consequently, the LRs of appellant No.6 are directed to be substituted as appellant Nos. 6(a) & 6(b). As a necessary corollary, the abatement is set aside with the delay being condoned for the said purpose.

7. The above order is to carried out by the office in course of the day. (R.K.Pattanaik) Judge I.A. No. 724 of 2023

1.

The I.A. is filed in terms of Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC for withdrawal of the appeal.

2.

Considering the ground stated therein, I.A stands allowed as no objection is also received from the respondents.

3.

Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed as being withdrawn. (R.K.Pattanaik) Judge Kabita

09.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 25-Jul-2023 12:21:13

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK R.S.A No. 114 of 2004). ← Search more judgments