Tikina @ Md. Nasartulla v. State of Odisha
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 483
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 149, 186, 307, 323, 325, 341, 353, 354, 392, 506
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27
- Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act s. 11(1)(a)(d)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to concerned Court, who afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference. (G. Satapathy)…
Judgment
Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP Order No. 01. CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER(ORAL) 12.02.2026
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Tigiria P.S. Case No.38 of 2023 corresponding to C.T. Case No.36 of 2023 pending in the file of JMFC, Tigiria, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.147/148/341/ 186/353/354/323/325/392/307/506/149 of the IPC r/w. Section 25/27 of the Arms Act and Section 11(1)(a)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, on the main allegation of illegally transporting cows and assaulting the Police party causing injuries to the IIC including one grievous injury to her.
Heard, Mr. Bijaya Kumar Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Pradhan, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record.
After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, there appears allegation against the FIR named accused persons and 20 others for trying to traffic cattle and assaulting the Police party, but the name of the present petitioner does not figure out in the FIR. In such view of the matter and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-(cid:224)-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 06.11.2025 and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial together with grant of bail to co-accused persons Chenga @ Jamal Khan in BLAPL No. 2944 of 2025, Sk. Abdul Taslim @ Sibaji in BLAPL No. 9906 of 2024, Sakil Khan in BLAPL No. 7903 of 2023, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits the Petitioner to bail.
Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and the Petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:- (i) the petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on a Sunday in each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for three(03) months from the actual date of release from the custody.
The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.
Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to concerned Court, who afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 13-Feb-2026 11:13:16
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.