Mr. P.K. Parhi, ASGI v. Abadhuta Jena & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ARINDAM SINHA
Outcome
Dismissed
The appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Arbitration Act, 1940 s. 33
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The appeal is dismissed. (Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant
Judgment
Appellants Mr. P.K. Parhi, ASGI Mr. P.P. Behera, CGC -versus- Abadhuta Jena and others … Respondents Mr. S. Palit, Senior Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No. ORDER 26.07.2022
This appeal has been preferred against order dated 31st August, 2002 passing decree in terms of award dated 14th August, 1995. Mr. Parhi, learned advocate, Asst. Solicitor General of India appears on behalf of appellant, while Mr. Palit, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of respondents. Respondents were claimants in the reference and award holders.
By order made this day, Court found that appeal preferred against order also dated 31st August, 2002, rejecting the petition filed by appellant under section 33, Arbitration Act, 1940, was without merit. In terms of section 17, impugned order was made pronouncing // 2 // decree on the award. As such, there is no infirmity in impugned order warranting interference in appeal.
Operative part
The appeal is dismissed. (Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration Act, 1940 — s. 33.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.