Manas Nayak v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Therefore, in view of the detailed reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 23.11.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 16906 of 2020 and W.P.(C) No. 18877 of 2021, this writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the said judgment. As the restrictions due…
Judgment
Mr. G. Sethi, Advocate Opp. Parties State Counsel CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER 10.01.2022 Order No. 01 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that the issue involved in this case is analogous to one involved in W.P.(C) No. 16906 of 2020 and W.P.(C) No. 18877 of 2021, which have been allowed vide common judgment delivered on 23.11.2021 by this Court.
Therefore, in view of the detailed reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 23.11.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 16906 of 2020 and W.P.(C) No. 18877 of 2021, this writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the said judgment. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021. Ashok (Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.