A No. 101 of 2010 · Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
permissible. Learned counsel for the appellant is unable to show before this Court any exceptional circumstances, thereby, interference by this Court may be made even on having statutory efficacious remedy. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the findings so recorded by the Court and also on perusal of the facts of the case, we are also of the opinion that the appellant is having efficacious alternative W . A. No. 101/2010 statutory remedy available under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and no exceptional circumstances are available in the case to interfere in writ jurisdiction ignoring statutory remedy. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in this appeal, hence, it is dismissed. It is made clear that if the matter is referred to the competent Labour Court on raising dispute then it shall be decided within a period of one year from the date of receipt of reference. With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed. (J.K. Maheshwari) (Brij Kishore Dube) J U D G E J U D G E SD`
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.