Criminal Case No. 39871 of 2020 · Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid, this application for leave to appeal stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
(SHRI ABHISHEK TUGNAWAT, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER) .....PETITIONER AND TEJKUMAR S/O MOHANLAL BARWE, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O NANDINI STUDIO, TILAK PATH, KHARGONE, P.S. KHARGONE, DISTRICT KHARGONE (MADHYA PRADESH) (NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT) .....RESPONDENT This application coming on for admission/orders this day, th e court passed the following: Heard. ORDER This application has been filed under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C. for grant of leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 13/01/2020, passed by learned Special Judge, Electricity Act, Khargone in SC ELE No.2175/2012(CNR No.MP1005-002152-2012), whereby learned Judge acquitted the respondent from the charge punishable under Section 135(1-a) of Electricity Act, 2003. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the Signature Not Verified Signed by: PREETHA NAIR Signing time: 03-09-2022 18:14:48 material evidence available on record, I am of the view that it is a fit case in 2 which permission for grant of leave to appeal can be allowed. Accordingly, the application filed by the applicant u/S.378(4) of Cr.P.C. is allowed and permission for grant of leave to appeal is granted. As a consequence of this order, this M.C.R.C. be converted into criminal appeal and registered as criminal appeal. Office is directed to issue bailable warrant against the respondent in the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) for his appearance before the Registry/Office of this Court on a date to be fixed by the office and on all other subsequent dates as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf. With the aforesaid, this application for leave to appeal stands disposed of. (RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: PREETHA NAIR Signing time: 03-09-2022 18:14:48
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid, this application for leave to appeal stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 378(4); Electricity Act, 2003.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.