✦ Madhya Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Consequently, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES MOTI BUNGALOW, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) DIVISIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UJJAIN DIVISION, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH) (SHRI BHUWAN GAUTAM, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE) This petition coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SUSHRUT .....RESPONDENTS ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI…

Judgment

(AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE - SHRI ABHAY PAREKH IN PERSON) .....PETITIONER AND

#3. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES MOTI BUNGALOW, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) DIVISIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UJJAIN DIVISION, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH) COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH) (SHRI BHUWAN GAUTAM, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE) This petition coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SUSHRUT .....RESPONDENTS ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI passed the following: ORDER The authorized representative of the petitioner/company - Shri Abhay Parekh is present in person. IA No.2118/2023 taken up, which is an application for withdrawal of present petition. For the reasons stated in the application, IA No.2118/2023 is allowed. Signature Not Verified Signed by: GEETA PRAMOD Signing time: 21-04-2023 11:09:33 Consequently, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 2 (S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE (PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: GEETA PRAMOD Signing time: 21-04-2023 11:09:33

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madhya Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2837 of 2007). ← Search more judgments