Judgment · High Court

Mr. Yashpal Rathore, counsel for petitioner. The prayer in the petition is to direct the respondents to grant two advance increments in terms of F.R. 22 D with effect from the date of promotion on the post of U.D.T. and refix the pay of the petitioner accordingly and pay the arrears along with interest. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment delivered by this court in the matter of State of M.P. Vs. Dayaram Patidar on 4/10/2002 in W.P.NO.1104/2001, therefore petitioner is entitled for the same benefit as has been extended to Shri Dayaram Patidar. In view of this, the present petition is also disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine the petitioner's case in the light of judgment of Dayaram Patidar passed in W.P.NO.1104/2001 and to pass necessary order positively within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is needless to mention that in case the petitioner is found eligible for grant of the benefits as has been extended to Mr. Dayaram Patidar, the same consequential benefits be also granted to the petitioner. (N.K.MODY,J.) MK 2