(BY SHRI LAKHAN SINGH CHANDEL, ADVOCATE) v. (BY SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. AND KARMCHARI SANGATHAN BHAVISHYNIDHI (SHRAM AVM ROJGAR MANTRALAYA) KENDRA BHAVISHYA NIDHI AYUKT HEAD OFFICE: 14, BHIKAJI KAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI (DELHI) ATIRIKT KENDRIYA BHAVISHYANIDHI AAYUKT KARAMCHARI BHAVISHYANIDHI SANGTHAN (SHRAM EVAM ROJGAR MANTRALAYA , BHARAT S A R K A R ) AREA OFFICE…
Judgment
(BY SHRI LAKHAN SINGH CHANDEL, ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONER
Operative part
AND KARMCHARI SANGATHAN BHAVISHYNIDHI (SHRAM AVM ROJGAR MANTRALAYA) KENDRA BHAVISHYA NIDHI AYUKT HEAD OFFICE: 14, BHIKAJI KAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI (DELHI) ATIRIKT KENDRIYA BHAVISHYANIDHI AAYUKT KARAMCHARI BHAVISHYANIDHI SANGTHAN (SHRAM EVAM ROJGAR MANTRALAYA , BHARAT S A R K A R ) AREA OFFICE , BHAVISHYANIDHI, BHAWAN, 59, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 1 K S H E T R I YA BHAVISHYANIDHI AAYUKT KARAMCHARI BHAVISHYA SANGTHAN SHRM AVAM ROZGAR MANTRALAYA, BHARAT SARKAR KSHTRIYA KARYALAYA, (MADHYA PRADESH) INDORE) BHAVISHYANIDHI AAYUKT KSHETRIYA 2 KARAMCHARI BHAVISHYA NIDHI SANGHTAN (SHRM AVAM ROZGAR MANTRALAYA, BHARAT S A R K A R ) KSHTRIYA KARALAYA INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI PANKAJ KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE) .....RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for orders this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. Prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Signature Not Verified SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI 17:35:03 IST (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) soumya 2 JUDGE SAN SAN Signature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SOUMYA RANJAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI DALAI 17:35:03 IST 17:35:03 IST
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.