PRADESH) v. (BY SHRI RAVINDRA RAJPUT, PANEL LAWYER)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the aforesaid, this criminal revision stands dismissed as having
Provisions considered
Judgment
(BY SHRI RAVINDRA RAJPUT, PANEL LAWYER) .....RESPONDENT This revision coming on for direction this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER This petition has been filed under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 16/11/2017 passed by II Additional Sessions Judge, Balaghat in Sessions Trial No.39/2017, whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge framed charges against the applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 120-B, 406 of the IPC. Signature Not Verified SAN According to the report dated 01/07/2022 received from Principal District & Sessions Judge, Balaghat, the S.T.No.39/2017 has been disposed of by II Additional Sessions Judge, Balaghat vide judgment dated 16/02/2022. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal revision stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 2 (RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified SAN SAN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid, this criminal revision stands dismissed as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.