POLICE v. (BY SHRI C.M. TIWARI, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Provisions considered
Judgment
(BY SHRI GHANSHYAM BARMAN, ADVOCATE ) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION MAHARAJPUR DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI C.M. TIWARI, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ) .....RESPONDENT This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This second application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the applicants for grant of anticipatory bail. Their first anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order 28.10.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 41233/2022 whereby liberty was granted to surrender before the trial Court and it was directed that if an 2 application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is filed, same be decided expeditiously. Applicants apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.54/2021 of Police Station -Maharajpur, District-Mandla (MP) commission of offence under Sections 420, 409, 120-B, 34 of IPC and Section 6(1) of MP Nikshepakon Ke Hiton Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam have again approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. As per provision of Section 14 of the MP Nikshepakon Ke Hiton Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam, an anticipatory bail under the Act can not be granted. Therefore, this second anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicants is dismissed. L.R. SINGH RANA 14:23:35 +05'30' (DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.