FIRST APPEAL No. 258 of 2008 · Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The present appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 23 r. 3
Judgment
MRS. JYOTI GOSWAMI W/O LATE SHRI KAMESHWAR GOSWAMI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O GOSWAMI X-RAY AHMIYA REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) (PARTIES THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL ) AND SMT.SARLA AGRAWAL W/O RAMESHWAR PRASAD AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, (MADHYA KRIKPALPUR DISTT. PRADESH) .SATNA SMT.SUDHA AGRAWAL W/O SHANKARLAL AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NEAR BUDHENATH MANDIR MIRJAPUR U.P. (MADHYA PRADESH) SMT.USHA AGRAWALW/O ANIL AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, IN FRONT OF MAIN POST OFFICE KATNI (MADHYA PRADESH) .....APPELLANT AGRAWALW/O SMT.PRABHA AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT SHITALPURI COLONY JABALPUR PRADESH) SHARAD 47 YEARS, (MADHYA
Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 11/15/2022 11:37:21 AM
2 SMT. SUMAN AGRAWALW/O LATE VIJAY AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, GOYAL MARKET AHMIYA ROAD REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) BALA JI URBANTHR; BRANCH MANAGER GANESH TOWER JAISTANBH CHOWK SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) M.L.DAGA OCCUPATION: CHAIRMAN URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. JAISTANBH CHOWK SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) BRANCH MANAGER P.N.B. MAIN BRANCH REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) BHANU PRATAP SINGH S/O S/O SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, NIRMAL CHHAYA KHUTEHI BEHIND BLOCK OFFICE TAH. HUZUR REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) INDU MATHURW/O SMT. P.C.MATHUR G H O G H A R DATT PLAZA OPP.SUDARSHAN MOTORS NAIPER TOWN JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) RAVIPRAKASH GOYAL S/O S/O LATE VIJAY GOYAL, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, GOYAL MARKET AHMIYA ROAD TAH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) MAYANK PRAKASH GOYAL S/O S/O LATE VIJAY GOYAL, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, GOYAL MARKET AHMIYA ROAD TAH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) KSHITIJ GOYAL S/O S/O VIJAY GOYAL, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, GOYAL MARKET AHMIYA ROAD TAH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) NIRBHAY SINGH S/O S/O S.P.SINGH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, BODABAGH TAH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) SMT. ANJU SINGHW/O DR.S.K.SINGH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BODABAGH TAH. HUZUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 11/15/2022 11:37:21 AM 3 .....RESPONDENTS (PARTIES THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL. SHRI SAKET MALLIK, ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF MS. SANJANA SAHANE, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5. ) This appeal coming on for conciliation this day, JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL passed the following: ORDER This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated
Operative part
18.3.2009 passed by 5th Additional District Judge (Fast Tract Court), Rewa in Civil Suit No.-4-A/2008 by which the suit filed by the plaintiff/ respondent was decreed. The parties have now moved an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC stating that they have already entered into compromise. On receipt of the application, the matter was sent to Registrar J-I for verification of compromise. Report has now been received from Registrar J-I stating that the compromise is in order and the parties have entered into the same without any fear or pressure. Therefore, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the report of Registrar J-I the application under Order 23 Rule 3 is allowed. The present appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into by the parties. Decree be drawn up accordingly. The terms of the compromise filed along with the application under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC shall be treated to be integral part of the decree. Court fees deposited by the appellant shall be refunded. (DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL) MEMBER (ANSHUMAN SINGH ) MEMBER Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 11/15/2022 11:37:21 AM mrs. mishra 4 Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 11/15/2022 11:37:21 AM
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The present appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 23 r. 3.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.